Age Discrimination Breach of Contract Class Action Disability and Discrimination Employment Discrimination Family Leave Gender or Sex Discrimination Glass Ceiling Harassment Hostile Workplace National Orientation Discrimination Non-Compete Contract Pregnancy Discrimination Racial Discrimination Retaliation Severance Pay Sexual Harassment Sexual Orientation Discrimination Unemployment Compensation Wage Dispute Whistle Blower Wrongful Termination
Personal Injury

Nurse Triumphs Against State in Harassment Suit

Jury Finds Department of Veterans Affairs Liable for Sex Abuse by Resident in Home
By: Jason W. Armstrong, Daily Journal Staff Writer

BARSTOW - In what could be the first verdict of its kind in California employment law, a jury has found the state Department of Veterans Affairs liable for the sexual harassment of one of its employees by a third party - a Veterans Home resident.

Barstow Superior Court jurors awarded former Barstow Veterans Home nurse Helga Carter $184,000, finding that her employer should have taken action to prevent a resident from repeatedly taunting her by staring and making sexually suggestive remarks.

"We're not aware of another verdict in the state that has held an employer liable for third-party harassment," Carter's attorney, Terry K. Davis of Santa Ana, said. "No other [California] case has interpreted it."

Immediate Action

Lawyers for the Department of Veterans Affairs could not be reached for comment, but Davis said the department has vowed to appeal.

During the trial in front of Judge John P. Vander Feer, Davis relied on Government Code Section 12940(j)(1), which specifies that an employer is liable for harassment by someone other than an agent or supervisor - including a customer, vendor or independent contractor - if the employer knew or should have known about the harassment and failed to take immediate action.

Third-Party Harassment

Davis also referred to several federal cases dealing with the issue of third-party harassment, including a 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals case in which the court affirmed a decision awarding compensatory damages to an Oklahoma Pizza Hut employee who was sexually harassed by a customer in the restaurant. Lackard v. Pizza Hut, Inc., 162 E3d 1062 (1998).

In another case that parallels Carter's, the 8th Circuit in 1997 affirmed an award of damages to three female employees of a group home who claimed a retarded teenage boy at the home continually groped them and sexually assaulted them.

The court found Focus Homes, Inc., the Minnesota company that operated the group home, responsible for: aiding and abetting the sexual harassment, retaliatory discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Crist v. Focus Homes, Corp., 122 E3d 1107 (1997).

"These cases demonstrate that an employer has an obligation to maintain an environment free of harassment," Davis said.

Los Angeles attorney Patrick McNicholas, who specializes in employment law, said that, while he's aware of numerous settlement in California involving third-party harassment claims against employers, the verdict in Carter's case appears to be unique.

"I think it's correct to say this is a verdict of first impression - it could be the first time a verdict has been obtained under these circumstances," McNicholas, a partner with McNicholas & McNicholas, said.

Carter sued the Department of Veterans Affairs in 1998, seeking unspecified general, punitive, special, economic and noneconomic damages for sexual discrimination, harassment, failure to maintain an environment free of harassment, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Carter v. California Dept. of Veterans Affairs, BCV03693 (San Bernardino Super. Ct., Barstow, verdict Oct. 2, 2001).

Carter, who worked at the Barstow Veterans Home as a registered nurse in the facility's Ambulatory Care Clinic, alleged that home resident Elbert Scott sexually harassed her several times a week between August 1996 and September 1997, staring at her breasts and buttocks and spewing lewd remarks.

"I want to try out my new penile implant on you," Brown told Carter, according to testimony.

"I want in your pants," he said on another occasion.

And then, more threateningly, he said, "If you don't sleep with me you will lose your job, marriage, family and home."

Brown also found Carter's home phone number and left frequent sexual messages on her answering machine, according to Carter's lawsuit.

Carter's supervisors denied her promotions and refused to address the harassment when she complained, and the stress forced her to quit in February 1998, she alleged.

Los Angeles Daily Journal
October 11, 2001
Vol. 117 No. 199

If you or a loved one has suffered abuse or discrimination, please contact a California Employment and Discrimination lawyer TODAY at the Law Offices of Terry K Davis.
1-800-783-9360
* Name:
* Home Phone:
* E-mail Address:
* Case Comments:
        
An attorney client relationship is not established by submitting this initial contact information to our office.

California Employment Lawyer Disclaimer: The California employment law, age discrimination, discrimination, racial discrimination lawsuit, wrongful termination, harassment or other employment law legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth herein are based upon the facts of that particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. Please contact an Age Discrimination Attorney or Employment Lawyer for a consultation on your particular personal injury matter. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of California.

©2010 Law Offices of Terry K Davis - California Age Discrimination Lawyers - Southern California Employment Attorneys - Employment Law Firm - serving clients throughout the State of California. All rights reserved.

Sitemap